In a match where Delhi Capitals (DC) were defending a modest total against Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB), the crucial death overs turned out to be a decisive factor. With just 17 runs needed from the final two overs, Axar Patel, the DC captain, found himself in a tough position to make the right bowling choices. Unfortunately, as pointed out by cricket experts Anil Kumble, Wasim Jaffer, and Sanjay Bangar, Axar’s decision to hand the 19th over to Mukesh Kumar instead of his best bowler, Mitchell Starc, might have been a misstep.
The situation looked manageable for DC when they needed 38 runs from the final 24 balls, given the tricky nature of the pitch. However, Krunal Pandya and Virat Kohli managed to score 12 runs off Mukesh in the 17th over, followed by another 9 runs off Dushmantha Chameera in the 18th over. But the game took a sharp turn in the 19th over when Tim David launched Mukesh for four boundaries (6, 4, 4, 4), making the chase much easier for RCB.
Anil Kumble criticized Axar’s decision, saying, “When you have 18-19 runs to defend in the last two overs, you give the 19th over to your best bowler.” Kumble further added that the intent behind giving Mukesh the ball instead of Starc was wrong, even if the outcome was the same. Starc, having previously defended 9 runs in a high-pressure situation against Rajasthan Royals (RR), could have been the ideal choice to bowl the 19th over, according to Kumble.
Sanjay Bangar also shared his thoughts on the matter, mentioning, “Axar must have thought that since Starc had defended nine runs in that last over, let’s give this to Mukesh and see… but the thought process was wrong. Your best bowler should have bowled that over.”
One of the significant factors behind Axar’s decision could have been his hesitation to bowl Vipraj Nigam, the legspinner, in such a critical moment. Although Nigam has been solid for DC this season, with 9 wickets at an economy rate of 9.34, he has been underutilized in the death overs. Wasim Jaffer pointed out, “I felt he [Axar] didn’t show enough trust in Vipraj. Maybe he could have been given two-three overs too. If a wicket had fallen, two overseas batters would have been there, and they might have found it tough.”
The decision to leave out Nigam might have been influenced by the presence of the in-form Krunal Pandya in the middle. At the time, DC’s best chance might have been to break through with a wicket, and Nigam’s leg-spin could have created that magic moment. However, Axar’s reliance on his pacers, rather than spinning the game with a potential wicket from a spinner, came back to bite DC.
Despite the loss, DC is still in a strong position to qualify for the playoffs, sitting at No. 4 with six wins from nine matches. Their remaining fixtures are against Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR), Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH), and Punjab Kings (PBKS) — teams in the bottom half of the table, giving DC hope of picking up more wins. However, the last two matches against Mumbai Indians (MI) and Gujarat Titans (GT) could pose a tougher challenge.
In hindsight, Axar’s choice of bowlers at the death overs may have cost DC the game, but they still have a solid chance of securing a playoff spot if they can bounce back in the upcoming matches.
Also Read : Finch Praises Kishan’s Smart Approach in SRH’s Crucial Win Over CSK
